Someone I know recently shared the following image on Social Media, and I think I understand the gist of what the writer was trying to say:
"Communication is one thing
but your tone while communicating
With someone is everything ."
The general thought that is being expressed is fine, I guess - but... holy cow! What's up with the grammar? Let's see, the "W" in "With" on the third line is capitalized, but not the "b" in "But" on the second line, which makes it seem like an entirely different thought. And where's the comma after the first line? And why is there a visible space before the period? Who wrote this? 1,000,000 monkeys with typewriters? 
With that in mind, perhaps what this statement could have said was:
"Communication is one thing,
but your tone while communicating
with someone is everything."
Of course, the redundancy for "communication" on the first and second lines is kind of amateurish; perhaps another word would have been better in either the first or second line? But then again, I believe the thought that the writer was trying to express is that "tone" is part of "communication," so it makes no sense to begin the with the word "communication" since it can't be both "part" and "everything" at the same time, though we can infer by context that the writer meant "speaking" when he or she wrote "communication" in the first line. In a like manner, "tone" isn't "everything" because "speaking" is still part of "communication." In other words, "communication" is "everything," of which "tone" and "speaking" are both parts.
Taking all of that into account, perhaps this statement would have been better?
"The spoken word is one thing,
but the tone of your voice when speaking to someone
often says more than your words."
Hmm... have I overthought this enough yet? 