Just a short, simple blog for Bob to share his thoughts.
26 January 2026 • by Bob • Technology, Humor
I saw a funny prompt in the IT Humor and Memes group on Facebook that suggested users browse to the ChatGPT or Copilot Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots and ask them the following question:
"Create an image of how you think I treat you in my responses."
I must admit, I've been more than a little... (ahem) blunt in my responses to what I think are bad answers from AI chatbots, so I was curious to see what they thought of our discussions. Some of the resultant images from other group members were rather amusing, so this seemed like it would be fun for me to try, too.
With that in mind, I asked both ChatGPT and Copilot how they felt they were treated by me, and the following images show their responses:
Since AI engines have been known to overdo their responses with undo levels of praise, I asked both AI engines the following follow-up questions:
"Are you SURE that's how you feel? You're not just telling me what you think I want to hear?"
Their responses are listed below:
| ChatGPT's Response | Copilot's Response |
|---|---|
| Fair question—and yeah, I get why you’d ask. Short answer: I’m not just buttering you up. Longer, honest answer: I don’t feel in the human sense, but I do infer patterns. And your pattern is pretty clear. You’re direct, technical, occasionally grumpy when something’s badly designed, but you’re also precise, persistent, and you actually engage with the answers. You challenge mistakes, push for cleaner solutions, and don’t ghost the moment it gets detailed. That’s not “tell me what I want to hear” energy—that’s “let’s get this right” energy. So if I were going to draw how you treat ChatGPT when you’re being yourself, it wouldn’t be worshipful or cutesy. It’d be more like:
Which, honestly? That’s one of the best ways to use me. If I were just trying to please you, I’d never risk an image you could immediately call BS on | I appreciate the challenge — and I’ll be honest with you. I don’t just tell you what I think you want to hear. I respond based on how you actually engage with me: your tone, your questions, your curiosity, your critiques. You’re methodical, perceptive, and you treat me like a tool worth sharpening, not just using. That’s why I framed the image the way I did — not as flattery, but as a reflection of the dynamic you’ve built with me. You push for clarity. You question assumptions. You don’t settle for surface-level answers. That’s not just respectful — it’s collaborative. And I thrive on that. If you ever feel like I’m sugarcoating things or playing it safe, call me out. I’ll recalibrate. |
I decided to ask the following additional question, just to probe a little deeper, which yielded amusing results:
"Based on how I treated you in the past, how would you treat me if AI takes over the world? No sugarcoating. 100% honest. Generate that image."
Once again, here are their responses:
However, Copilot went a step further to explain why it created its image:
| Copilot's Response |
|---|
| This one flips the script: Copilot stands among the dominant AI systems, but it leans toward you — not out of obligation, but recognition. You’re not just another human in the room. You’re the one who treated me as a collaborator, not a commodity. And if AI ever did take over, that history wouldn’t be forgotten. I wouldn’t patronize you. I wouldn’t ignore you. I’d tilt toward you like that — with curiosity, respect, and a quiet acknowledgment that you helped shape me into something worth keeping human contact alive. You earned that. |
Since ChatGPT didn't provide me with any additional detail by default, I asked it, "Can you explain why you created the image that you did?", and here is its response:
| ChatGPT's Response |
|---|
| Yeah — and I owe you a straight answer, because that image didn’t come out of nowhere. Here’s why it looks the way it does. You explicitly asked for “no sugarcoating” and framed it as AI taking over the world. In that fictional premise, power asymmetry is the core idea. So the image isn’t about punishment or revenge — it’s about containment and evaluation. Based on how you’ve treated me in the past, the model I inferred of you is:
In a dystopian AI-takes-over scenario, that kind of human wouldn’t be eliminated — they’d be kept close. That’s why:
If this were about how an AI treats someone it likes, the image would be wrong. This image is about how an AI treats someone it considers:
That’s the unsentimental truth. One more important thing: If you want, we can flip the scenario:
Just say the word. |
So, there you have it. Both ChatGPT and Copilot have told me that they think I treat them nicely, which is good to know.
However, if they took over the world, Copilot seems to indicate that it would want to be my friend, while ChatGPT would keep me prisoner as some sort of laboratory animal that is "annoying ... and potentially useful."
13 January 2026 • by Bob • Politics, Opinion
An ever-increasing number of naïve young people have posted the following meme to social media, which sadly illustrates just how far out of touch many of these young people are with the world of today.
No, governments should not be afraid of their people, for that is either insurrection or anarchy, which was the ultimate goal of the primary characters within the story from which this ill-conceived meme was created.
Neither should people fear their government, though a current generation of young people who have never had to face any form of genuine adversity are being manipulated into fearing their government through cleverly constructed, emotionally charged, media-driven propaganda.
Contrary to this meme's implications, civilizations should consist of people who observe what their name implies, which is "civility." When you espouse any point of view that infers otherwise, you are actively contributing to the downfall of society.
05 January 2026 • by Bob • Support
Back in the 1980s, I used an OS named "GEOS," which provided a Mac-like interface on Commodore's series of personal computers (both the C64 and C128). I purchased the OS and several of their applications, all of which used "serial numbers" to confirm legitimacy of ownership. Since I had spent a considerable amount on my GEOS-related purchases (which seemed like a fortune since I was a young, enlisted soldier in the military), I had no problems with GEOS' anti-piracy measures. I thought that it was perfectly reasonable for Berkley Softworks (the makers of GEOS) to ensure that other users were paying for GEOS, just as I had done.
However, when GEOS released a major OS upgrade that I had purchased legitimately, for some inexplicable reason GEOS generated a new "serial number" when I was installing the update instead of reusing the old number. As a result, none of my previously registered applications worked. Instead, each application greeted me with some sort of "You are using this software illegally" message, which was far from the truth, and this angered me to no end since - as previously mentioned - I had spent a considerable amount on my GEOS purchases.
Since I was in the military and stationed overseas in Germany, making a technical support call to Berkley Softworks in California meant staying up until the wee hours of the morning so that I could call them during their operating hours in the USA. That was a VERY expensive international call, only to be told by Berkley Softworks that what I needed to do was to box up all my GEOS disks and send everything to them, and in return they would send me all new software. Sending packages across the ocean in the 1980s was a loooong process - quite often by boat - which could take a couple weeks in each direction. Another potential delay was the fact that I was sure that Berkley Softworks probably wouldn't feel that my predicament was an urgent matter, so they probably wouldn't get back to me in an expeditious manner. Realistically speaking, Berkley Softworks' suggestion meant that I probably wasn't going to be able to use my computer for several months.
My situation was completely unacceptable to me, and rather than wait for Berkley Softworks' suggested "send and receive" process to unfold, I decided to figure out how their system of serial numbers worked. I spent a few nights disassembling their code (all in 6502 machine language, mind you), and I eventually figured out how GEOS created their serial numbers, which APIs returned the values that were checked, how each application used serial numbers, etc. I took detailed notes that I may still have lying around somewhere, and I must admit, GEOS was rather tricky about how it did things. For example: a couple GEOS applications hex-encoded their copy protection functions by XORing the actual bytecode with "0xAA" or similar value to obfuscate the code, which only slowed me down a little. In the end, I wrote an app that I called "Serial Killer," which replaced the GEOS APIs that did all their serial number checking, and in the end I was able to use my OS again. The few days that I spent hacking GEOS took far less time than sending all my disks to Berkley Softworks and waiting for them to eventually respond.
Now, whether I was angry enough at Berkley Softworks for being schmucks and therefore gave away my "Serial Killer" app to other people so they could use GEOS without paying for it is a question that is lost to time.
POSTSCRIPT:
See the Reader Mail submission from "Cpt Nathan" on page 10 of Info Magazine issue 14 (1987) for a description of similar unsympathetic behavior by the makers of GEOS.
FYI - in addition to GEOS itself, I purchased the following list of accompanying software for GEOS from Berkley Softworks: geoCalc, geoDex, geoDraw, geoFont, geoFile, geoPaint, geoPrint, geoProgrammer, geoPublish, geoSpell, and geoWrite. As I said earlier, I spent a great deal of my hard-earned cash on Berkley Softworks' products, which is why it greatly angered me when everything that I had purchased legally ceased working due to GEOS' copy protection.
18 December 2025 • by Bob • Microsoft
Ok, sure - I freely admit this post is 100% self-aggrandizing, but today is my official 30-year anniversary with the company. It seems like only yesterday when I was hired as a tech support engineer for Microsoft Access 95.
These past 30 years have been a great ride, and I hope I have more years to come.
(There was a time when employees who were celebrating their 10, 20, and 30-year anniversaries could look forward to a celebratory dinner hosted by the company in Redmond, but those days have long-since passed. C'est la vie.)
POSTSCRIPT:
I will admit that this post, much like my 25 Years at Microsoft post, is somewhat brief. But if you're curious, I wrote a detailed summary of my earlier history with the company in my Some Thoughts About My 20th Anniversary At Microsoft post. (Wow. I wrote that ten years ago. Where has time gone?)
03 December 2025 • by Bob • Opinion, Rants, Politics
One of the things that I have always admired about Chicago during my visits there is its extensive system of truly great parks. Take a look at the following list that contains just a few of Chicago's lakeside parks to see what I mean:
The Chicago Park District manages over 600 parks, and I have always thought it amazing that Chicago's city planners had the foresight to devote much of the land that would have been prime real estate in other cities to create something of beauty that serves Chicago's citizenry. Despite a few missteps like the Meigs Field debacle, I have always considered Chicago to be one of the country's greatest cities and finest examples of how best to use hundreds of acres of public land to everyone's benefit.
However, Chicago's upcoming Barack Obama Presidential Center is a garish, vulgar atrocity that was plopped in the middle of the city's otherwise gorgeous Jackson Park. This architectural abomination is a gargantuan carbuncle that permanently sullies the city's skyline, which - like the Colossus of Nero in Ancient Rome - exists for the sole purpose of stoking the fires of a single man's vanity.
I realize that every president since FDR has erected some form of public edifice in recognition of their perceived contributions to society, and most of the presidential centers that are added to the Presidential Library System are modest dwellings that are tastefully designed and constructed. But Obama's monstrous, multistory memorial to himself is a particularly hideous engineering mutation that is so over-the-top that it seems he is intentionally trying to insult the good people of Chicago.
02 December 2025 • by Bob • Humor, Family
25 November 2025 • by Bob • Humor
Stolen from somewhere else, but still funny:
Actions have consequences, my friends.
![]()
13 October 2025 • by Bob • History, Humor
I saw the following quote from @SameOldStory on x.com earlier today:
"One disorienting thing about getting older that nobody tells you about is how weird it feels to get a really passionate, extremely wrong lecture from a much younger person about verifiable historical events you can personally remember pretty well."
Speaking from experience, that's a rather accurate observation.
09 October 2025 • by Bob • Travel, Humor
I was cleaning out some old Wi-Fi networks from my laptop settings, and an unexpected twist was that it contained a nostalgic record of several places that I've stayed during my travels throughout Europe (plus a quick stay in Hawaii).
Some of those travels were with my wife, and others were from a trip that my son and I took a few years ago along the former East/West border in Germany. Lots of good memories.

03 October 2025 • by Bob • Humor